Navigation: Home > Quantum |
Quantum |
The ultra-violet 'catastrophe' By the end of the nineteenth century, scientists working on the way energy is radiated from a hot body had a problem. Their theory told them that, for a body at a given temperature, the amount of energy (e.m.radiation) radiated was proportional to its frequency. Unfortunately, this means that all the energy should be radiated at infinite frequency, which does not happen. The curve, for 5000 degrees K, for this 'classical' theory is shown in black in the graph below. (This graph has wavelength, rather than frequency, as the x-axis so that the region of interest is near the origin) The curve for 5000 degrees K, found by experiment, is shown in blue. The discrepancy was known as the 'ultra-violet catastrophe' as the experimental curve dips sharply at ultra-violet frequencies whereas the theoretical curve keeps on increasing. This was obviously a 'catastrophe' for the theory. The discrepancy between the curves for 5000 degrees K actually starts to become significant at wavelengths shorter than 3 micrometres. In
the early years of the 20th Century, Max
Planck and others found that the experimental curve can be explained
if energy is emitted, and absorbed, in discrete amounts (quanta) where the size
of a quantum is proportional to the frequency of the radiation.
Is the quantum explanation appropriate for all frequencies?Process versus principle Oscillating
electrons – microwave and radio Internal
molecular vibration – mid-infrared wavelengths It's similar to the ringing of a bell. This can be due to a nearby bell ringing at the same frequency (sympathetic vibration) or by striking the bell with a hammer. The energy of the hammer blow does not have to be a specific amount to cause the bell to resonate. Electron
jumps within an atom – infrared, visible, ultraviolet and x-rays Nuclear
processes – x-rays and gamma radiation Is the received photon the same one that was emitted?
A Two-Slit experiment can
be set up so that light quanta (photons) are registered at the target
one at a time. Over time an interference pattern builds up at the
target.
In Quantum Theory this is
interpreted as a photon emitted from the source, spreading out as a
'wave-function', passing through both slits, then interfering with
itself. A 'collapse of the wave-function' is necessary for the
photon to be in a single state and be absorbed by an atom in the
target.
However, the fact that
one photon at a time is detected at the target does not mean that
photons leave the source one at a time nor that discrete photons move from the source to the target.
All that is required for
the target to register the arrival of a photon is that an electron in
a target atom undergoes a transition to a higher energy level. Is there another way of looking at this process? Scenario
However, the combined
presence of many 'simultaneous' source transitions can produce the
necessary conditions for such a target transition. The presence of the
source transitions can pass through both slits and continue to the
target. Then, if a target atom is in the right place and in the right energy state, a
photon will be registered as arriving at the target. An interference
pattern builds up over time. In other words the photon does not have to be a discrete entity that moves from the source to the target. In this scenario there is no 'wave-function' and so no 'collapse of the wave-function' is necessary for a photon to be absorbed. A potential problem Solutions
For
a combination of these reasons it may be possible for only one photon at a
time to be detected at the target. The effect of detecting a photon at one of the slitsIf the
experimenter tries to detect which slit the photon passes through, the interference pattern disappears. Why should
this be? Consider the following explanation. The
experiment is set up so that photons can be detected as they pass
through one of the slits. When
an electron in a slit detector atom undergoes a transition to a higher
energy level, the conditions for an electron in the target atom to
undergo a transition may not be not met. Detecting
a photon at one of the slits changes the conditions at the target.
The apparatus behaves as though it has only one slit and no
interference pattern builds up. Mike Holden - Nov 2015 |
Navigation: Home > Quantum |